- Why testing is the real trap – Part 1
- Why testing is the real trap – Part 6
- Why testing is the real trap – Part 7
- Why testing is the real trap – Part 4
- Why testing is the real trap – Part 3
- Why testing is the real trap – Part 5
- Why testing is the real trap – Part 8
- Why testing is the real trap – Part 2
- Why testing is the real trap – Part 9
- Why testing is the real trap – Part 10 – Finale
The objection to testing has nothing to do with the competence of the test: The False PCR Test Distraction
It’s true the PCR test is not designed to diagnose disease. It’s true that a positive PCR test is not a reflection of anything.
But the problem is not whether or not the testing works – it is that there is any testing at all.
And the problem about arguing about PCT test effectiveness is that it makes it appear that there is no harm in taking the test itself. But as set forth here, it is the fact of testing, not the competency of the test which is the danger.
The objection to testing has nothing to do with the invasive danger of the test: The dangerous PCR test distraction
Some focus on alleged dangers and damages from the administration of the test itself.
This fools people into thinking that a non-invasive test, such as a spit test, is safer.
Again, it distracts from the real issue – all tests are dangerous because testing is the real trap.
Can you think of other distracting arguments? Let me know in the comments below.
Leave a Reply