This is 1st in a series of articles exposing the real public health agenda. The vaccine mandates are designed to distract us into narrow reactionary protests while the real infrastructure of tyranny is built unopposed. I apologize to those whose families and lives are being destroyed by what we will document here for not writing this long ago.
In a far away land, the poor and unheard are experiencing first hand the war of public health.
Just because it is in Kenya and Chad does not mean that it does not matter to you. It matters very much.
All the techniques of the public health tyranny and war are first implemented in poor countries where the people are easily fooled into complying with the public health imperialism advertised as for their benefit.
But then, once practiced and polished, the enforcement comes to America, and Canada and Europe.
Some Americans have heard about “Shielding” but those that have usually just sink into more fear-mongering about what could happen to them in America and focus on the concentration camp similarities.
But that self-centered approach is the strategy of defeat, where we react, too late, at our door steps.
Real victory will be achieved when we leave our shores and stand up for victims elsewhere, people we have never met and may never meet. Victims who are suffering the unbearable right now.
Like all evil plans, the terminology sounds benign and even ‘good.’ ‘Shielding’ sounds like people will be ‘defended’ and ‘protected’ from some great threat. But, the real threat in this evil plan now being executed is the ‘shielders’ themselves.
You can read the CDC’s implementation plan here, and I will translate the double-speak into plain English for you below.
Before we examine this evil, a little background: Amalek’s war on G-d Al-mighty and man seeks to destroy the fabric of humanity with war against G-d, against monarchy, against nation, against family, against the individual and against private property.
A core tactic is to break up community and to break marriage and the family.
A particular tactic is fomenting dis-orientation of procreative energy from pro-creative marriage into temporary chaotic experience-driven interactions, consensual and non-consensual.
Rabbi Yonoson Steif writes in Mitzvos Hashem that it is through sexual immorality that the world is destroyed. That is the outcome intended by those who foment it.
With this background, we can now understand that the driving force in ‘Shielding’ is not health but rather using the fear of ill health as an excuse to directly and forcibly dismantle marriage, family and community.
The easiest starting place to implement this is with people who have already been forced from their homes by manufactured crises. Once uprooted, a man is weakened and he becomes dependent on the services offered in way-stations and ultimately refugee camps. It is a struggle to keep a family together and larger clans intact.
Uprooting people is a technique to lower their defenses, put them in a mode of insecurity and impose new rules and restrictions. This was done for thousands of years including in Egypt where the people were relocated so they should be detached from what had previously been their private land. The Nazis used movement and relocation as a means to crush the spirit of the people with no base to defend.
So too, refugee camps are the ‘solution’ to the forced displacement and dislocation intentionally created through war, persecution, famine and infrastructure destruction.[Not coincidentally, the Lubavitcher Rebbe fought to prevent the flight of Jews from Brooklyn as a result of the intentional Marxist block-busting which was designed to dislocate the Jewish communities with its attendant spiritual and physical disruptions. The Rebbe understood that fleeing would play into the hands of evil plans and the solution was to push back and overcome by digging deeper roots and expanding the Jewish community.]
You will have to read to the end to see how the CDC itself admits the destruction of morality and the family knowingly and intentionally caused by Shielding.
The CDC Shielding guide is filled with double speak which I will now translate for you:
This document presents considerations from the perspective of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control & Prevention (CDC) for implementing the shielding approach in humanitarian settings as outlined in guidance documents focused on camps, displaced populations and low-resource settings.
Translation – “humanitarian settings” is a code word for vulnerable people who can be made to anything because they have no power, no voice, no property, no base and no allies. Also, the fact that this is a publication of American CDC and that they have adopted this policy, for now in foreign refugee camps, should mean that it is a policy they would seek to implement in America.
What is the Shielding Approach1?
The shielding approach aims to reduce the number of severe COVID-19 cases by limiting contact between individuals at higher risk of developing severe disease (“high-risk”) and the general population (“low-risk”). High-risk individuals would be temporarily relocated to safe or “green zones” established at the household, neighborhood, camp/sector or community level depending on the context and setting.1,2
Translation – “High-risk” is an arbitrary definition against which a man has no defense. Categorization of men is based on general statistical and numerical measurements – they have nothing to do with the individual, his health or his well-being.
They would have minimal contact with family members and other low-risk residents.
Translation – destroy the marriage unit, destroy the family unit, re-shuffle people as the perverse plan desires.
Current evidence indicates that older adults and people of any age who have serious underlying medical conditions are at higher risk for severe illness from COVID-19.3In most humanitarian settings, older population groups make up a small percentage of the total population.
Translation – public health wants you to believe that it has ‘evidence’ but in reality ‘older adults’ and ‘people of any age who have serious underlying medical conditions’ are linked to COVID-19 without proof of causation and other techniques are used to eliminate the elderly and infirm – another public health objective to improve the health statistics and health expenses of the general population by eliminating the unproductive and costly ‘unhealthy.’
As Mark Twain wisely said there are Lies, Darned Lies and Statistics. What he forgot to add is that even lower than the lies of Statistics is Epidemiology which is the use of numbers to create mythologies about disease and ‘causation by correlation’ using arbitrary input to create manufactured output to then spread fear and demand compliance. Once human life is governed by public health using the ‘evidence’ of ‘epidemiology’, an arbitrary and ruthless tyranny is created from which there is no appeal. In fact, anyone opposing it is creating danger and is dangerous.
‘Older adults’ may seem negotiable. So what if a few old people are removed from their homes to a ‘safe zone’? It is a central issue. The fifth of the Ten Commandments is to Honor Your Father and Mother. Central to the fabric of human existence of the care of our parents. Removing the elderly from their homes and placing them where they cannot be cared for or even visited by their children and grandchildren is a direct violation G-d Al-mighty’s Commandments.
For this reason, the shielding approach suggests physically separating high-risk individuals from the general population to prioritize the use of the limited available resources and avoid implementing long-term containment measures among the general population.
Translation – While removing people from their spouses and families and clans may seem cruel, comply or else the entire population will be incarcerated.
This manipulation makes Shielding ‘popular’ and even ‘demanded’ because it relieves the rest of the population of the some of the tyranny. But what the rest of the population does not realize is that they are, in fact, living in a tyranny. This is how public health obtains general support because of the fear of the general lockdowns and quarantines.
In theory, shielding may serve its objective to protect high-risk populations from disease and death. However, implementation of the approach necessitates strict adherence1,6,7, to protocol. Inadvertent introduction of the virus into a green zone may result in rapid transmission among the most vulnerable populations the approach is trying to protect.
Translation – This is a ruthless, no mercy, no exception approach, the full colors of public health on display.
The first level of life disruption is separating people in their own homes. This was successfully implemented in compliant households even in America. In fact, in Passaic, New Jersey, compliant families actually isolated family members cruelly avoiding any human interaction. Food was delivered by placing it outside the door of the banished family member. Some families actually forced non-compliant family members to live in isolation if they were not exacting in their mask wearing, and some actually forced those family members out of the home. Not only were they following the CDC, they were following the local trust influencers including rabbis and doctors who morphed into Shielding advocates and enforcers on behalf of the public health plan. And they were ruthless in their no exceptions, no mercy implementation. [A sample of marching orders for rabbis and ‘faith leaders’ cooperating as public health trusted influencers is found here.]
In doing so these misguided fear-ridden families completely diverged from the Torah. The Torah requires intimacy between husband and wife, closeness between parents and children, communal prayer and Torah study and visiting the sick. All these were abandoned in the name of the public health.
This is real my friends. The human connectivity that comes naturally among all living things and is enshrined in the Torah is intentionally attacked and dissolved by the public health ideology.
The next level of disruption is to uproot men and women from their homes and re-locate them into ‘swapped’ households. This takes the disruption of marriage and family to a new level. People are no longer just forcibly separated from each other within the same walls – they are now swapped out into other homes. This is a direct assault on marriage and family.
Marriage and family becomes subjugated to the whim of public health. When it suits public health a marriage and family can temporarily remain intact so long as public health allows it.
Somewhere, some time, these were called concentration camps. But then the entire refugee camp is a concentration camp with people held against their will from returning home and/or permanently resettling. Tightly controlled access and policing of interactions leaves the ‘green zone’ victims imprisoned within the larger prison of the refugee camp.
The Camp/Sector Level is the preferred method as discussed Table 2 of the the PDF referenced in footnote 1 of the CDC document.
At this point the CDC Shielding document goes into details of implementation referencing “humanitarian (SPHERE) standards.” What is SPHERE? See footnote 6 which takes you to the SHPERE Handbook which states:
Sphere holds a unique place in the sector and in the constantly evolving humanitarian landscape. This edition was clearly informed by the international commitments made at the first World Humanitarian Summit in 2016, the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and other global initiatives. “
In case you are not aware, the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development is the latest frontline document laying out the principles, objective, methodologies and marching orders of the war against procreation.
So the CDC Shielding is implemented using SPHERE which is an implementation tentacle of Agenda 2030.
There are many details, which we don’t have the space to explain, but they are all double-speak:
Dedicated staff need to be identified to monitor each green zone. Monitoring includes both adherence to protocols and potential adverse effects or outcomes due to isolation and stigma. It may be necessary to assign someone within the green zone, if feasible, to minimize movement in/out of green zones.
Translation – enforcers will be established to ensure compliance. Remember that in Level 1 the Household (HH) Level, the “green zone” is within that household. Enforcers will monitor those “green zones” also. Just like as in the ghettos under Nazi control, Jewish residents were appointed within the ghettos to control movement in and out of the ghetto on behalf of the Nazi public health enforcers, “it may be necessary
to assign someone within the green zone, if feasible, to minimize movement in/out of green zones." In other words, family members will be turned against family members and neighbors against neighbors with obtaining the 'status' of enforcers against their kin.
Isolation/separation from family members, loss of freedom and personal interactions may require additional psychosocial support structures/systems...
Translation - the distress caused by Shielding will further break down the individual who will then be offered medications and ways to cope such as being told that his suffering is really for the greater good.
...however in some humanitarian settings more than one quarter of the population may fall under high risk categories...
Translation - 25% of the population qualifies for Shielding!
Consideration: Plan for an extended duration of implementation time, at least 6 months.
Translation - this is not a short term movement.
Thus, contingency plans to account for a possibly extended operational timeline are critical.
Translation - Dear enforcer of public health policy reading this document, this is a permanent shift into public health command of every aspect of human life. Get to work!
Consideration: Ensure safe and protective environments for all individuals, including minors and individuals who require additional care whether they are in the green zone or remain in a household after the primary caregiver or income provider has moved to the green zone.
Explanation: Separating families and disrupting and deconstructing multigenerational households may have long-term negative consequences.
No translation necessary. That is the goal.
Shielding strategies need to consider sociocultural gender norms in order to adequately assess and address risks to individuals, particularly women and girls.
No translation necessary. That is the goal. Separate women from the family structure and leave them vulnerable to re-education into 'womens' health', birth control, promiscuity and abortion.
Restrictive gender norms may be exacerbated by isolation strategies such as shielding. At the household level, isolating individuals and limiting their interaction, compounded with social and economic disruption has raised concerns of potential increased risk of partner violence. Households participating in house swaps or sector-wide cohorting are at particular risk for gender-based violence, harassment, abuse, and exploitation as remaining household members may not be decision-makers or responsible for households needs.
No translation necessary. That is the goal. When you mix men and women together ('cohorting') there will always be these results. The Torah prohibits non-marital intimate relations and to prevent them bars any isolation or seclusion of any man and woman who are not married. Even for a moment. There is no good outcome of putting men and women together in seclusion - as we see by the mixing of men and women in the military. And, we already know that the "humanitarian" organizations and United Nations forces are a cesspool of Europeans and Americans taking advantage of women and minors. Shielding intentionally unravels the family and community units making women and minors even more accessible.
Consideration: Plan for potential disruption of social networks.
Explanation: Community celebrations (religious holidays), bereavement (funerals) and other rites of passage are cornerstones of many societies. Proactive planning ahead of time, including strong community engagement and risk communication is needed to better understand the issues and concerns of restricting individuals from participating in communal practices because they are being shielded. Failure to do so could lead to both interpersonal and communal violence.
Translation - All traditional community celebrations will be disrupted and victims of Shielding will be excluded. Intimidate the individuals and communities to prevent resistance to the public health ideology and rules.
Now, from the PDF "Guidance for the prevention of COVID-19 infections among high-risk individuals in camps and camp-like settings" which is one of the underlying documents the CDC document is based on.
An alert mechanism should be established to immediately report any resident who develops symptoms consistent with COVID-19 (i.e. fever and at least one sign/symptom of respiratory disease, e.g., cough, shortness of breath (16)). Any resident reported with such symptoms should be immediately isolated and – if resources allow – tested for COVID-19.
Translation - everyone will be under intense and constant surveillance and then further isolated.[The Guidance is published by the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. One of its graduates is Ethiopian Marxist terrorist and anti-procreation enforcer Tedros Adhanom, Director-General of the World Health Organization. Other graduates including a leading Austrian politician Pamela Rendi-Wagner. Remember it is Austria that is set to fine those who refuse the Genetic Code Injection. The School is also funded by the Wellcome Trust and the Gates Foundation among others and is responsible for many of the fear inducing epidemiological fantasy models discussed above.]
Consideration: Ensure mental health and psychosocial support structures are in place to address increased stress and anxiety.
Explanation: Additional stress and worry are common during any epidemic and may be more pronounced with COVID-19 due to the novelty of the disease and increased fear of infection, increased childcare responsibilities due to school closures, and loss of livelihoods. Thus, in addition to the risk of stigmatization and feeling of isolation, this shielding approach may have an important psychological impact and may lead to significant emotional distress, exacerbate existing mental illness or contribute to anxiety, depression, helplessness, grief, substance abuse, or thoughts of suicide among those who are separated or have been left behind. Shielded individuals with concurrent severe mental health conditions should not be left alone. There must be a caregiver allocated to them to prevent further protection risks such as neglect and abuse.
Translation - Those men and women who oppose and resist this assault on their family, their spouse and on their own soul and body will be treated as suffering from mental illness and treated accordingly.
And, again, the intended effect is exactly this, the breakdown of the individual in addition to the breakdown of nations, communities, clans, families and marriages.
Shielding is not something new invented in March 2020. The WHO has a publication on this from 2008. It was just rolled out to a new level as part of the March 2020 advance of the public health tyranny.
The CDC and WHO documents are just barely coded marching orders for the public health enforcers to step up tyranny to the next level of intensity and prevalence, the 'new normal.'
The public health folks are a patient bunch. They use each new 'fear wave' to gain public acceptance of greater tyranny. Public health activists were already calling for school closures and travel restrictions with the Swine Flu of 2009. It took them another 11 years of carefully laying the groundwork among medical doctors, media, religious leaders, politicians of all parties, etc., to have the general appearance of acceptance to actually pull it off.
Shielding may now be most active on a mandatory basis in distressed locations but you can be sure that the CDC document will guide thinking and become more implemented worldwide and in the United States. The people who are the target audience of the CDC document have been schooled and trained for decades in this thinking and ideology and are just waiting for the green light.
In fact, even some of the doctors and scientists who appear to speak out against the lockdowns are actually advocating Shielding when they say that 'only' the high-risk and elderly should be isolated. On one hand they appear to be advocating against the public health agenda, while they are actually advancing the public health agenda and promoting greater public acceptance of a cornerstone of the public health tyranny.
I have just scratched the surface. Hopefully you will investigate further and even get live footage and testimony from the victims.
Mandatory Shielding is well underway in United Nations occupied communities. Ghettos and then destruction of the family unit within the ghetto.
How can we not become emotional at the plight of these men, women and children suffering by the day and the hour? The public health tyranny is busy experimenting on their lives. The experiment is not to investigate the damages caused by Shielding - that is already proudly proclaimed in the instruction manuals. Rather the experiment is in how to most efficiently implement it with the greatest disruption and control and with the least opposition.
Right now, public health enforcers are being trained in the field on the people in African refugee camps to be able to become higher level enforcers both in Africa and their home countries.
Saying merely we won't let it happen in America is silly. It is already well planned and the infrastructure is in place. The courts have already agree to rubber stamp basically any public health emergency measure. And, in 2020, many voluntarily implemented it in their own homes as described above.
Waiting until the next public health move implementing Shielding in the United States is a recipe for defeat.
The only solution is the offensive.
Our job is to rescue Shielding victims in Kenya and around the world. Rescue them from the refugee camps and from the United Nations.
Instead of merely protesting the very narrow mandates, protests should focus on rescuing the victims of Shielding in Kenya and other countries. And, defunding the CDC and WHO permanently. [It's not coincidence that no one talks about that - that is not part of the 'allowed resistance' that well-meaning people are being corralled into. Phony opposition is not merely false leaders - it's false definition of the battleground and false definition of allowed actions.]
The victory of Amalek speaking the language of 'public health' is not inevitable. However, the victory of good people taking action on the side of G-d Al-mighty is inevitable.
Start letter writing campaigns. Call elected officials. Expose 'Shielding' and expose public health. Let's redefine the battleground.
What else do you think should be done? What are you willing to do? Let me know in the comments below.
It's only when we start to think about others and make an effort to bring their plight to light and to ease it and permanently resolve it do we have a chance to create an enduring and bright future.
Learn more about the strategies of victory. Be impervious to the strategies of defeat.